Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daily active users

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Active users. WP:SNOW czar 04:10, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Daily active users (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I previously merged this article into the Active users article, but this merger was partially reverted by Softlavender with the edit summary

"rv undiscussed merge -- you'll need to file and AfD to do this". As advised, I'm filing this deletion nomination with the intent to redirect Daily active users to Active users, as there is significant overlap between the two topics, and there is no content in the Daily active users article that is not already included in the Active users article. — Newslinger talk 05:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 05:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 05:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 05:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 05:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 05:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• What even? Why would the merge be rejected? Merge/redirect. --Izno (talk) 13:31, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Active users. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:49, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to active users, as with the other AFD. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 18:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Active users. -- Paleorthid (talk) 21:25, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Active users. Seems pretty uncontroversial to me. ZettaComposer (talk) 15:21, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Active users. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 20:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.