Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daisy A. Robinton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy A. Robinton

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing notability from GNG or research. Forbes listing is... a Forbes listing. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. TSventon (talk) 15:16, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Article in Nature that's been cited 1300 times [1], but I'm not sure how that stacks up overall. Doesn't seem notable otherwise, with little to nothing in RS. Oaktree b (talk) 00:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I wish people would ensure that they had proper pages (Google Scholar or similar) on their publications. There are enough name similarities that it is hard for me to know what her citations really are, beyond that they look modest. A good start, but I think WP:TOOSOON, particularly as she only has junior awards. Ldm1954 (talk) 00:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.