Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Barnabic
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:58, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Dan Barnabic
- Dan Barnabic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable activist and author. No significant coverage that is primarily about Dan Barnabic in independent, reliable sources, online or offline. Footnotes are all press releases, forum discussions, and COI publications. Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:35, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like a vanity bio to me; no evidence of WP:BIO whatsoever. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:43, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Not notable in any way, no widespread coverage. It also appears to me to be a vanity biography. --Yachtsman1 (talk) 21:46, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 15:00, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.