Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Reisner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ‎ snow keep. Graham87 (talk) 16:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Reisner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability Romidoll27 (talk) 11:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Artists, and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 14:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Sources 3, 5 and 9 are about a sculpture he made, seems to pass as an artist. Just notable. Oaktree b (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Oaktree is correct. Reliable sources currently in the article giving significant coverage include The Times of Israel, Haaretz, and The Jerusalem Post. Elspea756 (talk) 20:58, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Per Okatree. Marokwitz (talk) 14:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Passes the WP:GNG. New user. Not sure why they chose to nominate a notable sulptor. gidonb (talk) 05:05, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I'm having trouble finding notable museums that have collected his work, but it isn't necessary; the sources in the article demonstrate a clear pass of WP:GNG by providing reliable independent in-depth coverage of him. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Independent coverage is more than adequate. Kablammo (talk) 13:33, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: The editor who started this AFD has a ... bizarre editing history to say the least and I've blocked them as an obvious sock (the quacking is deafening). Graham87 (talk) 14:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you for taking action, Graham87! Can you also snow keep? There are two more discussions in the Israel queue that can use a speedy snow delete. At one I haven't !voted, just miss the button. gidonb (talk) 16:11, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Gidonb: Didn't think of that; will do. Graham87 (talk) 16:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]