Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Altman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:39, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Altman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was unable to find any articles actually about Altman that were not introductory blurbs connected with publications he was writing for. The sources here consist of his website, which is not indepdent, and the notice in the New York Times that he had been appointed to the New York Times staff, which is not indepdent. We lack independent 3rd party sources on Altman. John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:58, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete?. A few high cites on GS, but this poorly written BLP does not make much of a case: WP:Too soon? Xxanthippe (talk) 02:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete in this case as I also actually noticed he has 3,000 library collections, with the highest being 860, but I was unable to find links for that specific book, hence delete in this case, which would've immensely helped. SwisterTwister talk 04:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't satisfy WP:PROF. Fails WP:TOOSOON too...Rameshnta909 (talk) 18:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG. → Call me Razr Nation 00:29, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.