Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel C. Lynch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel C. Lynch

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure how this passes WP:GNG. The only WP:SIGCOV I was able to find was the New York Times article. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 04:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and United States of America. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 04:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There's long standing consensus that a full-length obituary in New York Times is unambiguous evidence of notability. As the announcement of his induction into the Internet Hall of Fame says:As a developer, researcher and evangelist of the TCP/IP protocols, Dan Lynch played a key role in driving global adoption of these protocols and fueling the Internet’s commercial success, public visibility and use. That's why he is notable. This will likely be a speedy keep. Jfire (talk) 05:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Computing. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He's not a household name, but he's one of the fathers of the Internet. Amazingly, Interop doesn't even mention Mr. Lynch. — Sean Brunnock (talk) 11:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - His inclusion on the Internet Hall of Fame definitely makes him notable. — Maile (talk) 15:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.