Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel MacGregor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:39, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel MacGregor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails notability guidelines. Only 2 of the refs talk about him (very little), all the rest are about his startup. I couldn't find any source that would talk about him in detail. Less Unless (talk) 15:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 15:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 15:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 15:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 15:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant independent coverage in reliable secondary sources. Danstronger (talk) 16:03, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly promoting the person's company. Looks like the company just got significant funding this year. Otherwise if had really been around since 2015 and had been notable by independent sources, a case might be made for the company. Not yet. W Nowicki (talk) 18:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.