Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Slager

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by User:Jinian per CSD A7, "No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event" and CSD G12, "Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://milkweed.org/about-us/contact-info/daniel-slager/ (foundational co...". (Non-administrator closure.) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:40, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Slager

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG promotional puff piece by conflict of interest editors. Theroadislong (talk) 20:37, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - Article looks to be the work of a COI editor, but more importantly while I see a number of sources about Mr. Slager, all of them are connected to Milkweed Editions. That, in combination with the COI issue, makes me think that while he is notable, a separate article (apart from the publisher's article) isn't justified. Alternative solution: delete without prejudice to being recreate by a user without a COI and who will use more and diverse sources. --— Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.