Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danilo Bassi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:58, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danilo Bassi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable researcher. Discussion of him I can find online consists entirely of papers he's authored, and a solitary news article on his company that mentions him by name once in the trailing commentary; I'm sure he's a fantastic researcher, but he doesn't pass our inclusion standards. Ironholds (talk) 16:57, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. H-index of 7; Google turns up no independent coverage despite an easy-to-search-for name. Article is an autobiography. Seems like his career is going fine but this is WP:TOOSOON for an article. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:46, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Can't find significant coverage. Doesn't appear to meet WP:PROF. ~KvnG 04:55, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Wos shows 9 papers with 1 citation among the corpus. Agricola44 (talk) 22:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.