Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Boy Styles (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Vanamonde (talk) 13:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Boy Styles

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One new interview since the last time this article went to AfD. I'm not convinced that enough has changed to rock the boat from the previous consensus, when the community said there was not enough in-depth coverage of him. —C.Fred (talk) 21:34, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

C.Fred You are wrong. Read the interview. It has established EVERY PIECE OF INFORMATION on the page. Stop abusing your power and use common sense instead. The new source isn't just an interview, its a lengthy credible article that verifies all the details of Danny Boy Styles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiggamafu (talk • contribs) 21:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not Delete There has been notability established with the source cited. I don't think a prominent music producer that is easily searchable online should have his Wikipedia page deleted based on your argument. There have been edits to fix the issues prior to the AfD such as the Discography has been removed. I sincerely believe this page should exist with the current information and help build it with more credible sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janky11 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 12 September 2016 (UTC) — Janky11 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete The "new" article was published before the last AfD took place, and one source does not establish significant coverage. Styles still does not meet WP:GNG/WP:ANYBIO/WP:MUSICBIO. WP:MUSICBIO excludes publications where artists talk about themselves. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not Delete The article establishes significant coverage since the coverage is solely based on where he's from, the fact that he's the main producer behind The Weeknd. There isn't anything else to cover, especially since the other information is correctly cited with credible sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanzadeh1 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC) [reply]
Delete Per original poster and previous AFD. VViking_TalkEdits 21:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 22:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 22:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser note: Janky11 and Alanzadeh1 are Confirmed sock puppets of the article creator, Jiggamafu. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jiggamafu.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:23, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we did before and nothing new justifies inclusion now.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.