Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darcey Vanderhoef

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Darcey Vanderhoef

Darcey Vanderhoef (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD [1]. Fails NACTOR. No noteworthy credits and little to no coverage in RS. KH-1 (talk) 00:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can't soft delete as a contested PROD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC(talk) 06:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Direct-to-video movies are hardly wikipedia worthy. Oaktree b (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 09:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darcey Vanderhoef, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.