Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Dom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Deb, CSD A7: No credible indication of importance; CSD G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:57, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Dom

Dark Dom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiography on a YouTuber with no WP:RS cited and nothing better found in a search of 'Dark Dom' or 'domsoepic'. He is very popular but that doesn't necessarily guarantee notability. I can't find anything to show a passing of WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:45, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Dom, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.