Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darryl Andrews

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Noting that the page previously deleted under this title was a different subject. ✗plicit 13:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Darryl Andrews (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I searched extensively but couldn't find much information. Although I have released some songs, they haven't gained much attention. As a result, they don't meet Wikipedia's general criteria (WP:GNG)or the specific criteria for its music category (WP:ENT). Jannatulbaqi (talk) 12:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and South Africa. Jannatulbaqi (talk) 12:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:BLP. Three essential sections are totally unsourced. A search online reveals that there are dozens of similarly named people. I can’t fathom how, in 2024, someone would waste their time on writing this mess and posting on main space, as if they’ve never read another article on Wikipedia. Bearian (talk) 01:54, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.