Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DataPortability

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close: Article has been speedily deleted as WP:G11 by Seraphimblade. (non-admin closure) AddWittyNameHere (talk) 20:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DataPortability

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination: I've just declined a proposed deletion request on the grounds that a very old nomination was declined a decade ago thus making this immune from WP:PROD. This article is at best very, very outdated to the point of uselessness, and at worst outright spam. ‑ Iridescent 08:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination - David Gerard (talk) 11:39, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- I'm only finding trivial mentions. This group does not appear to have made enough impact to gain sufficient coverage to meet GNG and NORG. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:11, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.