Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data Infosys

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:49, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Data Infosys

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar to the Ajay Data, this is completely written for Promotions alone. References are being used to mislead and building foundations to create such article. These days Wikipedia is filled with such promotions. Not-notable for encyclopedia material." top 20 most promising enterprise software product companies by technology magazine CIO Review" - is a hoax and blatant degree of spam. Wikipedia blocked such awards categories. Light2021 (talk) 19:12, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as blatant advertising and no foreseeable chances of notability at all, listed information and sources are simply advertising and republishing company words, therefore there's nothing independent, significant or substantial, case closed. SwisterTwister talk 21:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as corporate spam with no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-One word- corporate spam.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 08:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't seem to be anywhere nearer to WP:CORPDEPTH. Anup [Talk] 00:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam and likely paid editing. -- Dane2007 ^talk 05:11, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.