Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DatabaseUSA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw^talk 01:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DatabaseUSA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Only sources I was able to find are WP:ROUTINE coverage. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Speedy declined on the basis of the founder being notable. (I am not convinced that the founder being notable is a reliable indication of significance enough to pass A7, let alone notability.) Like most entrepreneurs, the founder has done many things and founded several companies. Some are significant, some not. His principal company, which is notable is infoGROUP, which does need an article. DGG ( talk ) 05:25, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This fails WP:GNG by a really wide margin. Every single reference I managed to find was a press release by the company. For a company to be notable, I expect at least a few reliable secondary sources. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:41, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.