Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Garrison (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:14, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Garrison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant, in-depth coverage independent of the subject. Went to AfD a decade ago and was closed as "no consensus" after a poorly attended discussion. Neutrality^talk 01:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, and Texas. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:24, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As the nominator suggests, there are no independent, reliable secondary sources that offer any significant coverage of him, and I can't find anything better. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:22, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect. Quick BEFORE check shows nothing for the subject or the talk show in the lead. I'm not sure how often we redirect failed congressional candidates, but we could send this to 2012 United States House of Representatives elections in Texas § District 25 as WP:ATD —siroχo 15:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per those above. I'm not sure this would merit a redirect given that Garrison didn't even qualify for the runoff of the primary election, let alone the general election. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:08, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Candidates are not notable just for being candidates, and it's even more crystal clear in retrospect. SportingFlyer T·C 17:56, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. No reliable secondary sources to show notability, thus notability has not been met. Fails WP:GNG. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 05:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.