Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Beisel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎ due to lack of participation. No prejudice to an immediate relisting at AfD if any editor desires. Daniel (talk) 10:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David Beisel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As with the company he cofounded, I am unable to locate anything independently written in reliable sources that address Beisel directly and in detail. There are few db style entries for the listings, but in my view they do not reach the threshold for biographical notability. Alpha3031 (t • c) 15:55, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Alpha3031 (t • c) 15:55, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, United States of America, California, and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:20, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This seems like an easy call for all the reasons listed. Delete. Go4thProsper (talk) 20:52, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, per the reasons presented. Nothing significant found about him. AllNotAll (talk) 18:36, 2 November 2023 (UTC) Blocked sock Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC) [reply]
• Keep appears to be very notable based on the coverage: [1], [2], [3]. Meets WP:GNG. 76.64.163.41 (talk) 16:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I can't ping you guys since you don't have accounts, but the suggestion that the person winning scholastic sporting competitions in Canada from 2003-2008 is the same as the subject, who claims to have co-founded and sold a company in 2002, seems... highly dubious, to put it lightly. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Maliner (talk) 18:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep he has been attributed to developing the concept of social commerce since the year that page was created in 2007 [4] 38.104.7.174 (talk) 17:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  That's not an independent reliable source that address the subject directly or in-detail. We need enough stuff from those sources to actually write an article from them Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.