Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Benac

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

David Benac

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not yet notable uner WP:PROF: 1 minor book, 4 journal articles. Not notable as a politician unless he gets elected DGG ( talk ) 00:53, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No pass of WP:Prof or WP:Politician. WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:41, 13 July 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. We don't usually have biographies of candidates for political office unless they're otherwise notable, and the subject does not meet WP:PROF or the WP:GNG. – Joe (talk) 09:25, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not elected yet, too soon. --Hirsutism (talk) 18:06, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable as a political candidate or as an academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:06, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Candidates for office do not get articles on Wikipedia just for being candidates, and this goes double for candidates in primaries — if they cannot be shown and sourced as already having cleared a notability standard for some other reason independent of their candidacy, then they have to win the election, not just run in it, to get a Wikipedia article because of the election per se. But this shows no preexisting notability as a professor at all. Bearcat (talk) 06:26, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of notability per WP:PROF and WP:Politician. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.