Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Brough

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 15:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

David Brough

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks notabiltiy. Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NBLP. Four of the seven references are articles written by the subject themselves and most of these journals themselves don't seem to scrape thru WP:N to have an article. AfD'ed it after a prod template was removed. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:49, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:13, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:14, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article about a working journalist. As the nominator indicates, references to the subject's own published articles/blog are insufficient. Any notability claim probably rests on the subject sharing an A. H. Boerma Award in 2003. However while I can see press releases announcing other recipients, I am not finding indication of this as a significant award which would demonstrate notability under WP:JOURNALIST criterion 1 or 4(c). AllyD (talk) 13:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per Norm and AllyD . Lapablo (talk) 19:29, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Can't find sources to show that he passes WP:GNG. Not independent enough or varied enough. THEFlint Shrubwood (talk) 18:21, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.