Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Kelly (mathematician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect‎. With the round robin title swap presented below. I don't see a compelling case against preserving the history with some folks advocating for a merger, as a protected redirect could be done if necessary. Star Mississippi 01:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David Kelly (mathematician)

David Kelly (mathematician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability standard per WP:NACADEMIC. I have found no significant coverage of Kelly's contributions to the mathematical field or his particular field of mathematics. He seems to be an impressive mathematician, but unfortunately has not had much of a large influence. GuardianH (talk) 22:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC) GuardianH (talk) 22:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Selective merge into Hampshire College Summer Studies in Mathematics: coverage of Kelly as a person is woven pretty heavily into the coverage of HCSSiM (as shown by my comment at the other AfD) and I think some portions of this article may be appropriate to merge there. As a second choice I'd be ok with a redirect without merge. --JBL (talk) 18:57, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • This looks unlikely to end in a keep (and I don't see enough notability for one). The main question appears to be to what extent it should be a redirect/merge. Arguing against the redirect is the fact that the David Kelly at Manitoba appears to pass our notability criteria, with several papers having over 100 citations in a low citation field. David Kelly (mathematician) would be a natural place for this article, note that Manitoba's David Kelly appears to rarely use his middle initial. I would suggest that if we end this in a redirect (possibly with some merging), then it would be best practice to Move, then redirect from David Kelly (mathematics educator) (or similar) to Hampshire College Summer Studies in Mathematics. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 11:03, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider the complicated proposal from Russ Woodroofe.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I didn't mean to hold up the procedure. Redirection looks like a reasonable alternative to deletion to me, but I don't think the article title is a good reflection of the subject, and it looks like it could cause some mild later problems. If article history is preserved, then some limited merging could happen at any time after close of AfD. Pinging previous participants @JayBeeEll, David Eppstein, and Nsk92: in hopes of winding this down. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 07:59, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • As I wrote above, I am strongly against preserving the article history. These kinds of redirects are all too easy to undo. There is nothing in the David Kelly article that is worth preserving. The Hampshire College Summer Studies in Mathematics article already mentions that HCSSiM was founded by "David Kelly, a professor emeritus of mathematics at Hampshire College." That's quite sufficient. Delete and redirect. Nsk92 (talk) 00:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Kelly (mathematician), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.