Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Neill
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) WJ94 (talk) 18:44, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- David Neill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject fails WP:GNG. There is a claim that he set a minor NCAA record 25 years ago but there is not significant coverage of the subject. User:Namiba 17:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football and Nevada. User:Namiba 17:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. A four-year starting quarterback at an NCAA Division I FBS school (those will likely always be notable), has abundant significant coverage, for example: LA Times, full page coverage in The Signal, Reno Gazette-Journal, Nevada Appeal (nearly two decades after his career), etc. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - There's not going to be any lack of coverage on him.KatoKungLee (talk) 17:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:SIGCOV identified by BeanieFan above. Frank Anchor 17:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Strongly keep It has a significant coverage. Enrico Manni (talk) 00:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.80.7.254 (talk)
- Keep but need a cleanup. Themanwithnowifi (talk) 04:45, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.