Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn's Early Light: Taking Back Washington to Save America

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 22:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn's Early Light: Taking Back Washington to Save America (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deletion discussion: I believe this article should be deleted, because it lacks notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnAdams1800 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, it meets both GNG and the relevant SNG. We have significant coverage across a decent span of time and at least three reviews from major publications. Also note that this AfD appears to be malformed. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:26, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 January 16. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Conservatism, Politics, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, meets WP:NBOOK with multiple reviews by reliable sources. (The article was in a much different state when nominated, thanks to Horse Eye's Back for making major improvements to it.) Schazjmd (talk) 19:57, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, per Horse Eye's Back and Schazjmd. Passes WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG. Sal2100 (talk) 19:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.