Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn Logsdon
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dawn Logsdon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. Not a single secondary source. All passing mentions. scope_creepTalk 09:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 1. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Widespread coverage of films she has directed and edited. Article just must be expanded. Thriley (talk) 19:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Thriley: I saw you working on to expand it, which is laudable. Do you have secondary coverage? It lot of seems to surface and no depth. WP:THREE will do. scope_creepTalk 19:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- I think she meets notability per WP:AUTHOR: "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work." The documentary films she has directed have received widespread coverage. I have not done a deep search for articles solely about Logsdon, but I think the coverage on her works makes that unnecessary for notability concerns. Thriley (talk) 19:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Thriley: The subject isnt an author as far as I can seen. She is a creative type. I need WP:THREE secondary sources that prove she is notable. Not passing mentions or interview or PR. scope_creepTalk 18:42, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- I think she meets notability per WP:AUTHOR: "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work." The documentary films she has directed have received widespread coverage. I have not done a deep search for articles solely about Logsdon, but I think the coverage on her works makes that unnecessary for notability concerns. Thriley (talk) 19:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Thriley: I saw you working on to expand it, which is laudable. Do you have secondary coverage? It lot of seems to surface and no depth. WP:THREE will do. scope_creepTalk 19:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- Keep It seems maintainable, but some parts of it require (more) sources. 110 and 135 (talk) 16:28, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 22:21, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Weak keep The article is not well written and can certainly be improved, but I believe she meets WP:GNG criteria. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:44, 11 May 2025 (UTC)