Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daybehavior (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Daybehavior

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable band failing WP:GNG and WP:NBAND. Went through an AfD before but it lacked sufficient participation to achieve consensus. Winner 42 Talk to me! 23:05, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete my searches turned up no significant coverage, and two sources provided on page aren't any better. Fails WP:MUSIC. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:55, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Their debut album is reviewed in Option, issues 78-81, p. 82, as well as Billboard, vol. 109, no. 52, p. 6 (where it is placed as a top 3 AOTY by one critic). Their latest material has been covered by Release Magazine. Neodop (talk) 17:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13_(talk) 17:05, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep because the coverage, all in all, may be thinly acceptable. Notifying past AfDers in case they're not aware of this new nomination: Duffbeerforme and Inks.LWC. SwisterTwister talk 00:06, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep As Neodop. J 1982 (talk) 14:24, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Cited coverage does seem slightly thinner than expected of a notable topic so relisting for one more !vote.. Esquivalience ^t 01:38, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 01:38, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moderate keep albeit red links on page, Google search result returns results. [ EnigmaLord515 (talk) 17:47, 12 December 2015 (UTC) ][reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.