Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Db technology
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 23:20, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Db technology
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Db technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. I found brief mentions and press releases (also a few general announcements), but nothing that equates to in-depth coverage on the company. CNMall41 (talk) 22:40, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 02:04, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 02:04, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 February 28. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:08, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: The text of this WP:SPA article describes the company's product features and funding history but makes no claim to notability. Searches are not finding better than routine listings for this company (noting the distinct UK-based testing firm). Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 10:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 13:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 13:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Cannot find anything beyond press releases. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:02, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete There don't appear to be any 3rd party sources and the article even lacks a claim to notability, the only sources it includes only indicate that the company exists SWL36 (talk) 22:56, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 19:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete echoing SWL36 Graywalls (talk) 18:36, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.