Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De-Trumpification

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, let me know or make a request at WP:REFUND. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:19, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

De-Trumpification

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Super POVy and synthy. Lumps together a bunch of disparate ideas, and is basically just an excuse to compare Trump to the Nazis. Of the six sources cited, five fail as WP:NEWSOPEDGolikom (talk) 07:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 January 26. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:46, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A well-established term, has had a Wiktionary entry for nearly a decade as well. --Tataral (talk) 16:28, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary - 77.22.105.31 (talk) 04:25, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:19, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The term itself fails WP:NOTDICT, and the underlying concept, i.e.the proposed process of addressing, mitigating and dismantling the political, social, and cultural influences associated with Trumpism, is vague and mostly hypothetical. As explained by the nominator, various sources use "de-Trumpification" to refer to different ideas, such as rolling back Trump's policies, investigating Trump and his associates, and removing Trumpism from society and the government. The broadest definition of "de-Trumpification" is only used in thinkpieces, which we should not base an article on as they are not reliable sources. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify. The article in its present state is just a collection of quotes that use the term, though it seems there's likely more to be written about the concept. – MW_(t•c) 22:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, that would be acceptable. The article was recently created and is still being developed. --Tataral (talk) 23:28, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
KeepArbeiten8 (talk) 08:25, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify Could become a notable topic, but there is a lack of high-quality sources on this subject. I spotchecked the current sources cited, and many of the sources barely discuss "De-Trumpification" and/or were low-quality(op-eds, letters to the editors, highly partisan newspapers). I also searched on Gscholar and Gbooks without success. We should wait for academic sources to arrive, as a subject matter as controversial as Donald Trump requires. I agree with nom and Helpful Raccoon. Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:16, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NEO, especially the use–mention distinction part. The current article is little more than a blob of quotes that use the term without discussing what it means or providing commentary on it. The sources offer no coherent definition of the term that I can see, and so the line (the proposed process of addressing, mitigating and dismantling the political, social, and cultural influences associated with Trumpism) appears to be an invention of the article's creator. Astaire (talk) 18:40, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and @Astaire. This term is scarcely used and just seems to be a POV fork of Trumpism. I would also back the effort to draftify the article instead if that option reaches broader consensus. Eelipe (talk) 05:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is this? 🤣🤣🤣 Delete, and fast. Not a known term outside of maybe Bluesky Social --77.22.105.31 (talk) 04:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.