Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De L'Assomption Boulevard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

De L'Assomption Boulevard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Completely unsourced article about an unremarkable arterial street in a city, with no strong evidence of notability. As always, all streets that exist are not automatically appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia; a street must be the subject of reliable source coverage about it in media to earn an article, not just nominally verifiable on a map. Bearcat (talk) 02:09, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:45, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No evidence of notability at all. There is no coverage about the subject. --♫CheChe♫ talk 19:04, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails GNG. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I'm been doing} 20:06, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Major bit of infrastructure in a major city. A quick Google turned up a ton of stuff in French, and I've put the more prominent items in the article.--Andreas Philopater (talk) 20:28, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your thoughts, Bearcat? --Andreas Philopater (talk) 16:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep enough significant coverage in reliable sources has been added to meet WP:ROADOUTCOMES. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:06, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.