Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deadly Companion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Donaldd23 (talk) 13:16, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deadly Companion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NFSOURCES. Yes, I'm aware it has a Leonard Maltin review (1 and 2). However, a listing in Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide is considered "insufficient to fully establish notability" per NFSOURCES. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 23:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:35, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:35, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, [[1]]. Why are so many early John Candy films being listed for deletion?? Donaldd23 (talk) 00:43, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I added information and references from The Globe and Mail, Starburst magazine and an Anthony Perkins biography. — Toughpigs (talk) 05:45, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Excellent work, Toughpigs. I withdraw this nomination. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 10:17, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.