Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debarar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 23:33, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Debarar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Different mapping service geonames dump, more hits with catalogue etc. sites running off the coords, but geonames says "unverified" and the aerials say there's no there there. Mangoe (talk) 11:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 22. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 12:13, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 12:13, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Doesn't seem to be anything there. Quick search shows nothing, therefore it's likely another non-place slowly becoming more 'real' via automated coord grabbing. Prince of Thieves (talk) 17:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for lack of substance, proof, citations, real information, etc. Softlavender (talk) 10:31, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.