Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deejahn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deejahn

Deejahn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The script appears to have broken, and I'd rather not retype my whole rationale, but basically I'm not seeing any independent coverage here. The sources are all fluffy and many of them simply republish words from the subject in first person. If better sources are found we'll need to be careful to ensure independence, given this aggressive self-promotion. Ovinus (talk) 20:11, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deejahn, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.