Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deejaycyfer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdwtalk 19:39, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deejaycyfer

Deejaycyfer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Can't find any reliable/proper third party coverage. Godsy(TALKCONT) 05:37, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 03:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 03:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 03:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 03:37, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.Godsy(TALKCONT) 03:40, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deejaycyfer, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.