Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Elements Music Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Elements Music Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The record label has not gained significant coverage in reliable sources to warrant a stand-alone article. None of the sources in the article are reliable. A search of the record label doesn't bring up nothing of relevance. The page creator created an AFC draft of the page, which was declined. Despite their submission being declined, the creator decided to move the draft to mainspace. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 00:49, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 00:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 00:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 00:53, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 00:53, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence passes WP:GNG or any applicable SNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:43, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.