Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepspace5

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deepspace5

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist with no verifiable references. References listed are dead links and one music database. I feel like a tourist (talk) 14:42, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This artical no question fails WP:NMUSIC.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 16:22, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did a quick search for sources. CCM Magazine refers to them in a review of one of the albums as "legendary underground collective DS5". There is an Allmusic biography (which is usually a fairly good indication of notability) and an album review. Exclaim! magazine also has an album review. There is also coverage in the All Music Guide to Hip-hop: The Definitive Guide to Rap & Hip-hop [1]. Already that's getting close to meeting WP:NMUSIC criterion #1. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 19:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — Enough coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG as indicated by Paul Erik. Also meets point 1 and 5 of WP:MUSICBIO, 5 due to releasing an album on Gotee Records/EMI Christian Music Group and one on Tooth & Nail Records. STATic message me! 03:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

'Keep I don't like the band, but they meet MUSICBIO as explained above. The article simply needs to be improved. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:47, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.