Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defamation Action League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Ripoff Report. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:14, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Defamation Action League

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the general notability guideline. Created by a single-purpose account. Tera TIX 08:57, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete as per nomination.Mccapra (talk) 16:44, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Tera TIX 09:05, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 15:06, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 15:06, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 15:06, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:06, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: on further reflection there might be enough verifiable content for a merge to Ripoff Report. Tera TIX 03:44, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Ripoff Report as not independently notable, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 15:08, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Ripoff Report as per above comment and merge, at best part of Ripoff Report's legal issues --Xaiver0510 (talk) 01:38, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge notability is clearly not satisfied, however it does seem relevant to Ripoff Report as noted above. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:48, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.