Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demijohn Limited

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Demijohn Limited

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails WP:NCORP. Angryskies (talk) 17:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. HighKing⁺⁺14:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 April 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The three RS referenced in the article (Sunday Herald, the Scotsman, and The Times) all failed verification and can't be counted on. A search on Nexis confirmed the lack of existence of these articles but disclosed about 20 pieces in various business pages of English and Scottish newspapers. Unfortunately, the longest of these was less than 200 words, making the "significant coverage" part of WP:GNG doubtful. The majority of these were also WP:MILL coverage of "local business owner sponsors event" type stories. No evidence is apparent of GNG or NCORP compliance. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:47, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All references are in passing/not reliable/broken. The text does not suggest this tiny business could meet WP:NORG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:57, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺14:03, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As others commenting have said there seems to be a lack of the coverage that would be needed to meet notability standards. Dunarc (talk) 23:00, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.