Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:56, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Denace

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, no reliable sources (except one that does not mention Denace), nothing useful found via Google News. Huon (talk) 19:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The lead itself doesn't even demonstrate notability ("unsigned but enjoys relative success"). Fairly significant prose issues as well, though SOFIXIT takes a back seat to the failure to meet GNG and WP:MUSIC. Primefac (talk) 20:33, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:04, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as this is not yet satisfying the applicable notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 05:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.