Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dermala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dermala

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No substantial coverage outside of WP:SPIP, fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. Possibly a case of WP:TOOSOON. Rentier (talk) 22:04, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:01, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet notability guidelines. Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:25, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete. obvious PROMO. it is kind of pitiful that they have to say the same thing three times just to fill out a stubby article. I think we get it that they are a microbiome company focused on skin. Jytdog (talk) 03:51, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.