Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Designing for virtual reality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per notions herein about the potential for merging, no prejudice against userfication if anyone is interested in accessing the content to perform such merge. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Designing for virtual reality

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Found this on PROD prowl, was nominated as under-referenced essay, but seems potentially notable and salvageable, hence nominating here for discussion. Samsara 14:12, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is an essay and a how-to guide, neither of which is permitted. I don't see how anything can be salvaged from this and the title of the article itself is in the style of a how-to. If there is any useful information in here, it can be moved over to virtual reality. freshacconci talk to me 15:10, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per WP:NOTMANUAL. There is a lot of information here though, so if any of it is of any relevance to virtual reality hopefully somebody with the knowledge could transfer some of it.

Delete - Relevant information should be merged to virtual reality. The content/page, as it currently reads, is unencyclopedic. Meatsgains (talk) 17:40, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This looks like a set of notes for the eventual creation of an article. Maybe the original author wants them back in their userspace? I don't think anyone else can salvage much from it. —Ruud 19:32, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, the original author, Jenserdetchnaia, has not visibly returned since the day the article was created, in spite of being notified of the PROD and AfD. Userfying would have the benefit of giving time to carry out merges as suggested above. Samsara 01:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above and WP:TOOSOON. The field is not so developed that we need more such articles for the general reader. Bearian (talk) 16:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.