Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desiigner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 14:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Desiigner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO; little depth of coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:ANYBIO; appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record. Fails WP:MUSBIO. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 April 11. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:29, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Has a notable charted single. If I am not mistaken, that makes WP:NMUSIC. John from Idegon (talk) 00:47, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Debut single is already a top 5 on the US Billboard 100, and various formulas have predicted it to be #1 next week (http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/7326571/rihanna-hot-100-eighth-week-ties-beatles) because it's video hasn't even been released yet, which would boost its streams to around 30 million next week. The song Panda itself deserves it's own wikipedia page, and the artist in question definitely NEEDS his own page. Dr. Universe (talk) 05:00, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as his single "Panda" has charted on a national music chart, satisfying WP:MUSICBIO point 2. Rebb ing 19:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, he is a very popular current artist, with a single that is positioned high on hip-hop charts around the country. --Miamiheat631^Talk 02:20, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep, the artist has a top 5 hit in the US and you nominate this for deletion? --Eurofan88 (talk) 19:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per all of the above.VictoriaGrayson^Talk 17:36, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.