Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destiny Navaira

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator‎. AfD withdrawn, article moved to draftspace at author's request. Sole delete vote was an SPA. (non-admin closure) Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Destiny Navaira

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; WP:SINGER; WP:MUSICBIO - sourcing to hyper-local media (mostly Tejano Nation) and no evidence of any sustained record of success, acclaim or other notability. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Music. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Texas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:58, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment given the detailed article and sourcing, I'm concerned about BLP issues, but haven't fully evaluated. —siro χ o 09:23, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment she was nominated for a Latin Grammy award, which is why I drafted the article. – jona ✉ 14:45, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Appreciated, but a nomination doesn't confer notability. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:47, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, I wasn't sure which is why I didn't create the article outright. I'd actually prefer it to be redirected to a sandbox rather than to be deleted so that I have a starter draft to work on if, or when, she becomes more relevant. – jona ✉ 14:51, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are no votes on this AfD, so if you like I can withdraw it and send the article to draft? The only thing is, you'll need to edit it every 6 months to stop it being deleted, but if that works for you it would seem elegant to me! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Appears to be a fan page sourced mostly by websites. 128.252.154.9 (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Apparently, we are waiting for the page creator to say they are okay with draftification so the nominator will withdraw this deletion proposal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AJona1992 Do you want us to move this article to your sandbox so that we can close this discussion now? Okoslavia (talk) 05:47, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy per the creator. Good faith attempts by experienced user. Okoslavia (talk) 06:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Liz, can we close this and draftify the article even though there's a 'delete' vote now? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:05, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexandermcnabb that delete vote is by Single purpose IP. Okoslavia (talk) 07:35, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you're right at that. Liz is right, too, I was waiting on @AJona1992. Happy to withdraw and anyone can close/draftify. Not comfortable closing it myself, not entirely sure that's appropriate... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:59, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late response, yes please send it to the draft space. Thanks – jona ✉ 15:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.