Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Detensor Method
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Subject lacks notability and is written about in an unacceptably promotional manner. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:31, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Detensor Method
- Detensor Method (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:42 Zad68
15:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:52, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:52, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. No coverage in the relevant literature (e.g. no PUBMED hits). Seems promotional/fringe. Alexbrn (talk) 16:31, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree. It's promotional and doesn't seem notable enough for an article here. -- BullRangifer (talk) 04:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Sets a new bar for craptasticness LeadSongDog come howl! 16:30, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as this is exactly what I've been seeing rather often at NPP and it's troubling because it could be accepted but needing better improvements....thus Delete until and if ever better is available, best restarted at best. SwisterTwister talk 05:05, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as not notable enough to be included in an encyclopedia. Article carries a promotional tone and thus unencyclopedic. — Music1201 talk 01:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete fails GNG. Philafrenzy (talk) 08:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable and carring a promotional tone. JumpiMaus (talk) 16:15, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.