Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dharmaram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 03:20, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dharmaram

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This probably qualifies for speedy deletion, since it purports to be a disambiguation page with only one entry. However, it has been around for four and a half years, and I am loathe to speedy something that might be better handled through cleanup. As I'm not sure what the best course of action should be, please consider this an article for discussion, as opposed to deletion, per se. LadyofShalott 20:26, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. LadyofShalott 20:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. LadyofShalott 20:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep User:LadyofShalott, please look over the page as it is and consider withdrawing nomination. I looked at 'What links here' and resolved incoming links, which gave it two more entries, plus, as there are lots of partial matches, added {intitle} to see also. Boleyn (talk) 14:36, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- Let me see if I can get at least a stub to turn that Karimnagar Province redlink blue first. LadyofShalott 17:20, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Eihter way, it's three valid entries, as the redlink meets MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION. Boleyn (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, seems fine now. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 22:43, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep nom misunderstands deletion process. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:53, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per above.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.