Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DigiHive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DigiHive

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of reliable independent sources to substantiate notability. Few Google hits, mostly unrelated. Created by a WP:SPA, Google strongly indicates WP:COI. Guy (Help!) 01:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Every Morning (there's a halo...) 02:07, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 20:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.