Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digicorp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:47, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Digicorp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a barely known company that does web development consulting with small products that have little or no traction. They have little press in newspapers. Specifically, the youtube video is about a product that no longer exists, the times of india article doesn't work and the India Today write-up is just a small magazine story about the company. Reduciblenominee (talk) 17:38, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 17:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 17:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I have fixed the link to the Times of India article. For your information, India Today is not a "small magazine", it's the most read English weekly magazine in India according to the Indian Readership Survey 2014. Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 04:25, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think the comment meant that the article, not the magazine, was small . . . Chris vLS (talk) 21:30, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha yes you might be right but since I got confused, it's probably best to clarify. Biwom (talk) 05:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as simply none of this actually suggests better for the applicable notability, nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 22:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.