Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilbagh singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yes, there were a lot of SPA-!voters in this AFD, but even assuming all the SPA !voters are one person, their point is valid. Relying on the sources added by GSS-1987 and other sources which were asserted to exist through invocations of GNG, the delete !votes, all of which came before the article was improved are invalid. The claims of socking might be overblown: the sources assert that the subject singer is popular, and two of the IPs geolocate to different service providers.-- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:35, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dilbagh singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poor English, creator NOTHERE, lack of citations, disputed Notability, lack of facts. Tried to fix article, but couldn't. L3X1 (distant write) 20:55, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:NACTOR and WP:NMUSICIAN Spiderone 09:10, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of passing WP:NBIO. Ajf773 (talk) 09:11, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I have extended the article a little bit and included some sources but I'm unsure if it passes WP:GNG. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:26, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep-the redited version looks good. The person is notable enough to keep the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.215.152.182 (talk) 20:06, 12 March 2017 (UTC) — 106.215.152.182 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Quack quack. L3X1 (distant write) 21:51, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep- Passes WP:GNG and should be kept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinayaksingh101 (talk • contribs) — Vinayaksingh101 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

More quackery. I will accuse you of being a sock, as voting in this AfD is the first thing you have ever done. Keep these lies up and I'll run and get SEMI. L3X1 (distant write) 23:40, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment- Mr./Miss L3X1, I'm not a sock, I gave my vote on the basis of the sources given in the article. I had an account previously on Wikipedia but forgot its password and since I didn't use my email id in the first place, I couldn't retrive the account. So, let's not go around accusing people for nothing. I would request you to go through the article once again and decide for yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinayaksingh101 (talk • contribs) 07:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The subject is notable according to the links provided in the article and should be retained according to the Wikipedia policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The motionless freak (talk • contribs) 18:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Looks good to me based on the references and citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.176.168.105 (talk) 18:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I'm from Punjab and I'm aware of his work. Also, the article looks nicely linked for each claim. So, my vote goes for keep. Nandika Singh —Preceding undated comment added 19:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep he is a very known personality in punjabi music industry and Bollywood and the links attached are testimonial of the fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.115.91.213 (talk) 07:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Adheres to Wikipedia's notability policy. Instantly Maters 14:56, 1 April, 2017 —Preceding undated comment added 09:26, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment: Note that basically every keep !vote here is a SPA. Kharkiv07 (T) 01:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.