Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimitri Philippou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 02:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dimitri Philippou

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only famous for a legal battle with Virgin, surely a case of BLP1E? Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He has also been running a company that is a group which starting to become a competitor for the virgin group, doesn't that warranty a Wikipedia entry? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phathu K (talk • contribs) 07:41, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now but feel free to draft and userfy as I found nothing better than links at News and browser and we can wait for a better article to be made. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 16:05, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails BLP1E Secret (talk) 19:37, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Searches did not turn up the in-depth coverage necessary to meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:42, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.