Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinosaur from the Deep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sst✈^(conjugate) 04:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaur from the Deep

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Article has not been sourced since its creation. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 00:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone 06:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone 06:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Cavarrone 06:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Created by a sock, but edited by multiple editors since then; sourced fine enough and hardly a deletion candidate. Nate • (chatter) 08:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced fine enough? This article is unsourced! Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 17:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So what?? You really should go read WP:NEXIST. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 18:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

keep per due diligence showing the film topic itself as notable even if the article is unsourced. Issues with an article created months before a block, are correctable through regular editing... and not a cause for deletion. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 18:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

searches per WP:BEFORE:

type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

filmmaker aka:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep and I would've closed as such, keep if can be improved. SwisterTwister talk 19:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.