Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirk Bezemer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 14:40, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dirk Bezemer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested BLP prod, no evidence of notability. Acroterion (talk) 16:47, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 16:56, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Owlf 17:08, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:13, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Very weak keep. He has a plausible case for WP:PROF#C1 via well cited publications in Google Scholar [1] but we need more than a link to his personal web page to support even a stub like this. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 14:34, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep a case of WP:NEXIST Lightburst (talk) 20:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, clearly relevant according to WP:PROF#C1 with 4 publications with > 100 citations. But I agree, the article needs some work. --hroest 20:52, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article, it's notable and some sources as A, B, C, D, F, you can find that paid to subject.Forest90 (talk) 11:24, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.