Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Lisa Irwin (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 03:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disappearance of Lisa Irwin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:EVENT. as sad an event it was, 4 years after the disappearance there is no long term notability. The best the coverage lasted was a discounted false sighting in 2013 LibStar (talk) 15:39, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KeepMore than one news cycle of coverage, so not just a transient interest. Many people disappear, but most of them are youths or adults who want to disappear, and vanishingly few are infants who vanish from their beds in the muddle of the night. Coverage in 2012:[1] Coverage in 2014: [2] [3] Coverage in 2015: [4] [5] Edison (talk) 17:16, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 22:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 22:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. BabbaQ (talk) 10:24, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - continued coverage indeed. A simple Google news search gives plenty of coverage this year alone. WP:NOTABILITYISNOTTEMPORARY.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:28, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above - Google brings up tons of news articles on her [6], Article meets GNG so clear Keep IMHO. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 02:27, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.